Bitlaw

MPEP 2144.02: Reliance on Scientific Theory

This is the Ninth Edition of the MPEP, published in March 2014

Previous Section: §2144.01 | Next Section: §2144.03

MPEP Chapter Index
Chapter 2100: Patentability
2144: Supporting a Rejection Under

2144.02   Reliance on Scientific Theory [R-08.2012]

The rationale to support a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103 may rely on logic and sound scientific principle. In re Soli, 317 F.2d 941, 137 USPQ 797 (CCPA 1963). However, when an examiner relies on a scientific theory, evidentiary support for the existence and meaning of that theory must be provided. In re Grose, 592 F.2d 1161, 201 USPQ 57 (CCPA 1979) (Court held that different crystal forms of zeolites would not have been structurally obvious one from the other because there was no chemical theory supporting such a conclusion. The known chemical relationship between structurally similar compounds (homologs, analogs, isomers) did not support a finding of prima facie obviousness of claimed zeolite over the prior art because a zeolite is not a compound but a mixture of compounds related to each other by a particular crystal structure.).