MPEP 2173.05(r)
Omnibus Claim

This is the Ninth Edition of the MPEP, Revision 07.2015, Last Revised in November 2015

Previous: §2173.05(q) | Next: §2173.05(s)

2173.05(r)    Omnibus Claim [R-11.2013]

Some applications are filed with an omnibus claim which reads as follows: A device substantially as shown and described. This claim should be rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph, because it is indefinite in that it fails to point out what is included or excluded by the claim language. See Ex parte Fressola, 27 USPQ2d 1608 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1993), for a discussion of the history of omnibus claims and an explanation of why omnibus claims do not comply with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph.

Such a claim can be rejected using form paragraph 7.35. See MPEP § 706.03(d).

For cancellation of such a claim by examiner’s amendment, see MPEP § 1302.04(b).