MPEP Section 806.05(g), Apparatus and Product Made *
Executive summary:
This document contains Section 806.05(g) ("Apparatus and Product Made * ") of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (the "M.P.E.P."), Eighth Edition, Eighth Revision (July 2010). This page was last updated in January 2011. You may return to the section index to find a particular section. Alternatively, you may search the MPEP using the search box that appears on the left side of every page of BitLaw--you may restrict your search to the MPEP on the search results page.
For more information on patent law, please see the Patent Section of BitLaw. For patent services, see the Beck & Tysver pages.
Previous Section (§806.05(f)) | Next Section (§806.05(h))
806.05(g) Apparatus and Product Made * [R-3]
An apparatus and a product made by the apparatus can be shown to be distinct inventions if either or both of the following can be shown: (A) that the apparatus as claimed is not an obvious apparatus for making the product and the apparatus as claimed can be used to make **>another materially different product<; or (B) that the product as claimed can be made by another * materially different apparatus.
Form paragraph 8.19 may be used for restriction requirements between apparatus and product made.
**>¶ 8.19 Apparatus and Product Made
Inventions [1] and [2] are related as apparatus and product made. The inventions in this relationship are distinct if either or both of the following can be shown: (1) that the apparatus as claimed is not an obvious apparatus for making the product and the apparatus can be used for making a materially different product or (2) that the product as claimed can be made by another materially different apparatus ( MPEP § 806.05(g)). In this case [3].
Examiner Note
1. This form paragraph is to be used when claims are presented to both the apparatus and product made ( MPEP § 806.05(g)).
2. In bracket 3, use one or more of the following reasons:
--the apparatus as claimed is not an obvious apparatus for making the product and the apparatus as claimed can be used to make a different product such as......--,
--the product can be made by a materially different apparatus such as......--.
3. Conclude restriction requirement with one of form paragraphs 8.21.01 through 8.21.03.
<The examiner must show by way of example either (A) that the apparatus as claimed is not an obvious apparatus for making the product and the apparatus as claimed can be used to make **>another materially different product< or (B) that the product as claimed can be made by another * materially different apparatus.
The burden is on the examiner to provide an example, but the example need not be documented.
If applicant either proves or provides convincing argument that the alternative example suggested by the examiner is not workable, the burden is on the examiner to suggest another viable example or withdraw the restriction requirement.