T.M.E.P. § 1207.04
Concurrent Use Registration
Executive summary:
This document contains one section of the Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (the "TMEP"), Fourth Edition (April 2005). This page was last updated in June 2007. You may return to one either the section index, or to the key word index. If you wish to search the TMEP, simply use the search box that appears on the bottom of every page of BitLaw--be sure to restrict your search to the TMEP in the pop-up list.
For more information on trademark law, please see the Trademark Section of BitLaw.
Previous Section (§1207.03) | Next Section (§1208)
1207.04 Concurrent Use Registration
1207.04(a) Concurrent Use - In General
Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. 1052(d), contains a proviso under which an eligible applicant may request issuance of a registration concurrent with the registration of a conflicting mark.
In a concurrent use application, the applicant normally requests a geographically restricted registration. The applicant seeks registration for a specified geographical area of the United States and lists one or more parties who concededly have rights in the mark in other geographical areas of the United States. These other parties may own applications or registrations, or they may have common law rights in a mark, but no application or registration. "Incontestable" registrations (i.e., where the registrant's right to use the mark has become incontestable pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1065) are subject to concurrent use registration proceedings. See Holiday Inn v. Holiday Inns, Inc., 534 F.2d 312, 189 USPQ 630 (C.C.P.A. 1976); Thriftimart, Inc. v. Scot Lad Foods, Inc., 207 USPQ 330 (TTAB 1980). However, registrations and applications to register on the Supplemental Register and registrations under the Act of 1920 (see TMEP §1601.05) are not subject to concurrent use registration proceedings. 37 C.F.R. 2.99(g).
Concurrent use registration is requested by the applicant; it should not be suggested or initiated by the examining attorney.
1207.04(b) Filing Basis of Application Seeking Concurrent Use
In an application based on use in commerce under 15 U.S.C. 1051(a), the applicant may seek concurrent use registration at the time the application is filed or in a subsequent amendment. See 37 C.F.R. 2.73(a).
In an application based on a bona fide intent to use the mark in commerce under 15 U.S.C. 1051(b), the applicant may not amend to seek concurrent use registration until the applicant files an acceptable amendment to allege use or statement of use. 37 C.F.R. §§2.73(b) and 2.99(g).
In an application under §44 or §66(a) of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. 1126 or §1141f(a), the applicant may seek concurrent use registration, if the mark meets the requirements of the statute and rules for concurrent use registration. Concurrent use applications under §§44 and §66(a) are very rare.
1207.04(c) Basis for Concurrent Use Registration
If an applicant requests a concurrent use registration, the examining attorney must first determine the basis for seeking such a registration. An application for registration as a concurrent user is either: (1) subject to a concurrent use registration proceeding before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or (2) pursuant to the final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction of the concurrent rights of the parties to use the same or similar marks in commerce. See 15 U.S.C. 1052(d); 37 C.F.R. 2.99.
1207.04(d) Determining Eligibility for Concurrent Use
An applicant is eligible to request a registration subject to concurrent use if it meets one or more of the following criteria:
(1) The concurrent use request is sought pursuant to a decree of a court of competent jurisdiction reflecting its final determination of the rights of the concurrent user;
(2) The owner of the registration consents to the grant of a concurrent use registration to the applicant; or
(3) The applicant's date of first use in commerce is before the filing date of the pending applications or of any registrations issued under the Trademark Act of 1946. When a party specified as an excepted user does not own an application or registration, the applicant's date of first use in commerce is before the filing date of any application to register the mark that may be filed by the excepted user.
The applicant has the burden of proving that it is entitled to a concurrent use registration. 37 C.F.R. 2.99(e).
1207.04(d)(i) Requirements for All Concurrent Use Applications
An application for registration as a lawful concurrent user is generally examined in the same manner as any other application for registration. 37 C.F.R. 2.99(a). The examining attorney must examine the application to determine whether it complies with the relevant requirements for a non-restricted application (see 37 C.F.R. §§2.32 - 2.41). Additionally, the applicant must comply with the following requirements in a concurrent use application:
(1) The applicant must specify the goods and the geographic area for which the applicant seeks registration of the mark. 15 U.S.C. 1051(a)(3)(D); 37 C.F.R. 2.42. The applicant must also set forth the mode of use. 15 U.S.C. 1052(d); 37 C.F.R. 2.42.
(2) The applicant must specify, to the extent of its knowledge, the exceptions to its claim of exclusive use, listing any concurrent use by others and the relevant goods, geographic areas and periods of this use. 15 U.S.C. 1051(a)(3)(D); 37 C.F.R. 2.42.
(3) The applicant must also list the names and addresses of the concurrent users, the registrations issued to or applications filed by them (if any), and the mode of such use. 37 C.F.R. 2.42.
(4) The verification for concurrent use should be modified to indicate an exception, that no one else except as specified in the application has the right to use the mark. 15 U.S.C. 1051(a)(3)(D). See TMEP §804.02.
The applicant does not have to insert the stated exceptions in the verification or declaration; the exceptions may be set forth anywhere in the application.
In addition to the requirements noted above, which apply to all applications for concurrent use registration, concurrent use applications must meet other conditions, depending on whether the application is subject to a concurrent use before the Board (see TMEP §§1207.04(e) et seq.) or pursuant to the decree of a court (see TMEP §§1207.04(f) et seq.).
1207.04(e) Applications Subject to Concurrent Use Proceeding Before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
If an application for concurrent use registration complies with the above requirements and it appears that the applicant is entitled to registration but for the question of concurrent rights, the examining attorney will approve the application for publication subject to a concurrent use registration proceeding. 15 U.S.C. 1062(a).
Ordinarily, the examining attorney should not require an applicant for concurrent use registration to submit evidence in support of its claim to concurrent rights. However, the examining attorney should refuse registration under §2(d) if the applicant has requested a concurrent use registration and information in the record suggests that the applicant has not met the basic requirements for concurrent use registration (e.g., if the application indicates that the applicant adopted and used the mark with knowledge of the rights of a person specified as an excepted user, or that actual confusion has resulted from the concurrent use of the marks of the parties in their respective geographic areas). See In re Place for Vision, Inc., 196 USPQ 267, 269-70 (TTAB 1977). Gray v. Daffy Dan's Bargaintown, 823 F.2d 522, 3 USPQ2d 1306 (Fed. Cir. 1987), aff'g 229 USPQ 474 (TTAB 1986).
1207.04(e)(i) Preparing the File for Publication
When the examining attorney determines that the mark in an application that is subject to a concurrent use proceeding is ready for publication, the examining attorney should prepare the file as follows:
(1) The application must contain a concurrent use statement that will be printed in the Official Gazette. The statement may be submitted by the applicant or prepared by the examining attorney. The statement must be in the following form:
Subject to Concurrent Use Proceeding with ____________ [specifying the application serial number(s) or registration number(s), if any, of each other party; otherwise, the name and address of each other party].
Applicant claims the exclusive right to use the mark in the area comprising _____________ [specifying the area for which the applicant seeks registration].
(2) To aid in the preparation of the file by the Legal Instruments Examiner ("LIE"), the examining attorney should prepare a brief summary of the relevant concurrent use information. The information on the summary page should be set forth in the following manner:
CONCURRENT USE SUMMARY
Applicant:
Address:
Mark:
Goods or services:
Other Reg. or Serial Nos.:
Dates of use:
Areas of use:
EXCEPTIONS TO EXCLUSIVE USE
Name:
Address:
Mark:
Goods or Services:
Reg. or Serial No.:
Dates of Use:
Area of use:
After publication, if no opposition is filed, or if any opposition that is filed is dismissed or withdrawn, the Trademark Trial andAppeal Board will institute the concurrent use proceeding. The Board will consider and determine concurrent use rights only in the context of a concurrent use registration proceeding. 37 C.F.R. 2.99(h). See 37 C.F.R. 2.99; TMEP §1506.
See, generally, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Manual of Procedure ("TBMP") Chapter 1100.
1207.04(f) Application for Concurrent Use Registration Pursuant to Court Decree
Under the last two sentences of §2(d), the Office may issue a concurrent use registration pursuant to the final determination of a court of competent jurisdiction that more than one person is entitled to use the same or similar marks in commerce. An applicant who seeks a concurrent use registration on the basis of a court determination does not have to claim use in commerce prior to the specified dates or obtain the consent of the owner of the involved mark, and the registration may be issued notwithstanding the possibility of public confusion. See Holiday Inn v. Holiday Inns, Inc., 534 F.2d 312, 189 USPQ 630 (C.C.P.A. 1976). Cf. Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Dunhill Tailored Clothes, Inc., 293 F.2d 685, 130 USPQ 412 (C.C.P.A. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 864, 133 USPQ 702 (1962).
When examining an application for concurrent use registration pursuant to the decree of a court, the examining attorney must determine whether the application complies with the specific requirements for concurrent use applications (see TMEP §§1207.04(d) and (d)(i)) and the requirements that would apply to an unrestricted application.
In addition, under 37 C.F.R. 2.99(f), all of the following conditions must be met, or a concurrent use proceeding before the Board must be prepared and instituted:
(1) The applicant is entitled to registration subject only to the concurrent lawful use of a party to the court proceeding;
(2) The court decree specifies the rights of the parties;
(3) A true copy of the court decree is submitted to the examining attorney;
(4) The concurrent use application complies fully andexactly with the court decree; and
(5) The excepted use specified in the concurrent use application does not involve a registration, or any involved registration has been restricted by the Director in accordance with the court decree.
If any of the above conditions are not satisfied, the examining attorney will approve the application for publication subject to a concurrent use registration proceeding (see TMEP §§1207.04(e) and (e)(i)) , rather than pursuant to the court decree. 37 C.F.R. 2.99(f).
1207.04(f)(i) Preparing the File for Publication
If the application complies with all of the conditions listed in TMEP §1207.04(f) and all other relevant requirements, and is otherwise entitled to registration, the examining attorney will approve the application for publication of the mark. The examining attorney should prepare the file as follows:
The application must contain a concurrent use statement to be printed in the Official Gazette. The statement may be submitted by the applicant or prepared by the examining attorney. The statement will delineate the concurrent rights of the parties as determined by the court, in the following form:
Registration limited to the area comprising __________ [specifying the area granted to the applicant by the court and any other restriction designated by the court] pursuant to the decree of ______________ [specifying the name of the court, proceeding number and date of the decree].
Concurrent registration with ________________ [specifying the application serial number(s) or registration number(s), if any, of each other party; otherwise, the name and address of each other party].
After publication, if no opposition is filed, or if any opposition that is filed is dismissed or withdrawn, the application will mature into a registration.