T.M.E.P. § 204.03
Examining Attorney's Handling of Applications That Are Erroneously Accorded a Filing Date
Executive summary:
This document contains one section of the Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (the "TMEP"), Fourth Edition (April 2005). This page was last updated in June 2007. You may return to one either the section index, or to the key word index. If you wish to search the TMEP, simply use the search box that appears on the bottom of every page of BitLaw--be sure to restrict your search to the TMEP in the pop-up list.
For more information on trademark law, please see the Trademark Section of BitLaw.
Previous Section (§204.02) | Next Section (§205)
204.03 Examining Attorney's Handling of Applications That Are Erroneously Accorded a Filing Date
Sometimes an application under §1 or §44 that does not meet the minimum requirements of 37 C.F.R. 2.21 for receipt of a filing date is erroneously referred to an examining attorney for examination. In this situation, if the examining attorney discovers the error before issuing an action in the case, then the examining attorney should have the application declared informal. The USPTO will cancel the filing date and refund the filing fee. See TMEP §204.01.
If, however, an examining attorney discovers after issuing an action that the application as filed did not meet the minimum requirements for receipt of a filing date, then the examining attorney should issue a supplemental Office action, refusing registration on the ground that the application was not eligible to receive a filing date. Any outstanding refusals and requirements should be maintained and incorporated into the supplemental Office action. The applicant should be given six months to comply with all filing date requirements. If the applicant fails to qualify for a filing date within the response period, the application is void. The examining attorney should have the filing fee refunded and update the USPTO's automated records to indicate that the application is abandoned.
If the applicant complies with the filing date requirements within the six-month period, the application will receive a new filing date as of the date on which the applicant satisfied all the minimum filing date requirements. In such a case, the examining attorney must conduct a new search of Office records for conflicting marks, and issue a another Office action if necessary.