11.19 Disciplinary jurisdiction; Jurisdiction to transfer to disability inactive status.
- (a) All practitioners engaged in practice before the Office; all practitioners administratively suspended; all practitioners registered to practice before the Office in patent cases; all practitioners inactivated; all practitioners authorized under § 11.6(d) to take testimony; and all practitioners transferred to disability inactive status, reprimanded, suspended, or excluded from the practice of law by a duly constituted authority, including by the USPTO Director, are subject to the disciplinary jurisdiction of the Office. Practitioners who have resigned shall also be subject to such jurisdiction with respect to conduct undertaken prior to the resignation and conduct in regard to any practice before the Office following the resignation. A person not registered or recognized to practice before the Office is also subject to the disciplinary authority of the Office if the person provides or offers to provide any legal services before the Office.
Grounds for discipline; Grounds for transfer to disability
inactive status. The following, whether done individually
by a practitioner or in concert with any other person or persons and
whether or not done in the course of providing legal services to a
client, or in a matter pending before the Office, constitute grounds
for discipline or grounds for transfer to disability inactive status.
Grounds for discipline include:
- (i) Conviction of a serious crime;
- (ii) Discipline on ethical grounds imposed in another jurisdiction or disciplinary disqualification from participating in or appearing before any Federal program or agency;
- (iii) Failure to comply with any order of a Court disciplining a practitioner, or any final decision of the USPTO Director in a disciplinary matter;
- (iv) Violation of any USPTO Rule of Professional Conduct; or
- (v) Violation of the oath or declaration taken by the practitioner. See § 11.8.
Grounds for transfer to disability inactive
- (i) Being transferred to disability inactive status in another jurisdiction;
- (ii) Being judicially declared incompetent, being judicially ordered to be involuntarily committed after a hearing on the grounds of insanity, incompetency or disability, or being placed by court order under guardianship or conservatorship; or
- (iii) Filing a motion requesting a disciplinary proceeding be held in abeyance because the practitioner is suffering from a disability or addiction that makes it impossible for the practitioner to adequately defend the charges in the disciplinary proceeding.
- (1) Grounds for discipline include:
- (c) Petitions to disqualify a practitioner in ex parte or inter partes matters in the Office are not governed by §§ 11.19 through 11.60 and will be handled on a case-by-case basis under such conditions as the USPTO Director deems appropriate.
- (d) The OED Director may refer the existence of circumstances suggesting unauthorized practice of law to the authorities in the appropriate jurisdiction(s).
[Added, 73 FR 47650, Aug. 14, 2008, effective Sept. 15, 2008; paras. (a) and (b)(1)(iv) revised, 78 FR 20180, Apr. 3, 2013, effective May 3, 2013]